The Holocaust Story

If the Holocaust was an event in history, it should be open to the routine critical examination to which all other historical events are open. Those who feel it right to argue against the “unique monstrosity” of the Germans should be free to do so. No one should be imprisoned for thought crimes. Contrary to how Hollywood and the Israeli-Firsters have it, the Holocaust story is not about Jews. It’s about Jews and Germans together, inseparable, for all time to come.

Monday, February 20, 2006

British historian Irving admits to denying Holocaust

Although Irving doesn't appear to be taking a brave "Here I Stand"-like position, as many would prefer he has made a key point when he commented:
"That was no Holocaust denial, that was only (a statement) about a part of the (Holocaust) history," Irving said. This strikes at the critical question of "What is Holocaust Denial?"


It appears that criticism of any aspect of the Holocaust amounts to "denial." The Holocaust has taken on religious dimensions with the standard Holocaust canon being considered inerrant and supported by law in many so-called Western democracies. Therefore Irving has earned heretic status by questioning that very inerrancy of the Holocaust. The media likes to suggest that "deniers" reject the entirety of the Holocaust -- but this is untrue. The reality is that bits and pieces are rejected which then amounts to the charge of denial of the entirety of the Holocaust.

The Holocaust happened -- even most "deniers" would agree to this. The real question is what was the Holocaust? How did this happen? How extensive was the tragedy of the Jews of Europe? No other event in history is defined as the sum of its parts. No one defines the Vietnam war by the number of casualities. Surely no one would suggest that if a historian claimed fewer casualties that they denied that Vietnam happened. We often here anti-revisionists draw a comparison to Slavery. But again, the period of Slavery in the United States is never defined by how many slaves labored. Beyond the specialists, who even knows that number?

The Holocaust is treated not as other historical events but with all the protection of religion. You will believe or you will be charged with heresy. The story of the Holocaust is inerrant as is the Bible. Today we are in a period of the Holocaust Inquisition. We can only long for the freedom that will arrive with the Holocaust Reformation. Irving may not stand by his works of the past--but the time will come when a brave stand will be made -- and then the truth will set us free.

British historian Irving admits to denying Holocaust

VIENNA (AFP) - British historian David Irving admitted in an Austrian court to having denied the Holocaust in 1989 but said he no longer holds that view.

"I acknowledge my guilt on this charge," Irving said, seated behind a witness stand facing judge Peter Liebetreu.

Irving, who faces a possible 10 years in jail, said he now realized his statement that "there were no gas chambers in Auschwitz (was) false."

But Irving had earlier told reporters upon entering the court in central Vienna in handcuffs that it was "ridiculous for me to be standing here on trial for something I expressed 17 years ago."

"I am not a Holocaust denier," he said. "My views have changed. History is a constantly growing tree. ... The more documents are available, the more you learn, and I have learned a lot since 1989."

Asked about the Holocaust, he said: "I would call it the Jewish tragedy in World War II" and that millions of Jews died.

Irving, whose handcuffs were removed as the trial began, insisted on the accuracy of his historical research, as Liebetreu peppered him with questions about Holocaust denials he had made in the past and how he felt about them now.

Irving said he had changed his mind since 1989 after discovering documents, some of them from Adolf Eichmann, who organized the Nazi genocide of the Jews, while on a trip in Argentina.

But Irving insisted on the logic of some of his past statements, such as saying that the fact that 100,000 people survived Auschwitz was a sign that the gas chambers did not exist, even if he now regretted the formulation.

Under questioning from prosecutor Michael Klackl, Irving also refused to say that his statement about the gas chambers was tantamount to denying the Holocaust occurred.

"That was no Holocaust denial, that was only (a statement) about a part of the (Holocaust) history," Irving said.

Klackl later told reporters: "We know about David Irving, that he always tries to arrange every evidence and find many reasons why you should take his argument in the right way."

Klackl said he was "convinced" the jury of six women and two men would reach a verdict Monday, although he refused to speculate on the outcome.

Irving, 67, faces a 10-year prison sentence under an Austrian law that prosecutes those who "deny the genocide by the National Socialists or other National Socialist crimes against humanity."

The right-wing historian was arrested in November after a routine check on a highway in Austria.

The warrant for his arrest was issued by a Vienna court in 1989 after he allegedly denied at meetings in Austria that the Nazi regime used gas chambers in concentration camps.

Irving was on trial for also saying that the November 1938 Kristallnacht pogrom against the Jews was not the work of the Nazis but "unknown" people who had dressed up as storm troopers and that Adolf Hitler had in fact protected the Jews.

The Holocaust was Nazi Germany's systematic slaughter of some six million Jews, mainly in the later years of World War II.

Irving has become notorious worldwide for attempting to establish, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary, that Hitler was not party to the Holocaust, that there were no gas chambers in Auschwitz, and that the number of Jews killed by the Nazis was greatly exaggerated.

He has been condemned by the courts several times, notably in Britain and Germany, and last year he was refused entry to New Zealand.

He is reportedly also banned from residing in Australia, Canada, Italy and South Africa as well as Germany.

Irving sparked widespread outrage with his book "Hitler's War" in 1977, in which he claimed the Nazi dictator did not know about the mass killings of Jews until 1943 and that he never ordered the Holocaust.

In 2000, Irving lost a high-profile libel case in London against US historian Deborah Lipstadt, who called him a "Holocaust denier" in her book, "Denying the Holocaust: The Growing Assault on Truth and Memory."

Irving carried a copy of "Hitler's War" when he entered court Monday.

Original Story

1 Comments:

  • At 12:37 PM, Anonymous Gaston Zubillaga said…

    Irving forced to recant, as Cole did many years ago. Yet, their publications and investigations on the holocau$t tale are not to be forgotten, and it´s the one weapon which zionists and holocau$t promoters can´t shut.

    Freedom for Rudolf and Zundel

     

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home